{"id":1295,"date":"2026-08-21T08:26:07","date_gmt":"2026-08-21T08:26:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/forage-quality-testing-guide-ndf-adf-rfv-cp-and-how-to-read-a-hay-test-report\/"},"modified":"2026-08-21T08:26:07","modified_gmt":"2026-08-21T08:26:07","slug":"forage-quality-testing-guide-ndf-adf-rfv-cp-and-how-to-read-a-hay-test-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/forage-quality-testing-guide-ndf-adf-rfv-cp-and-how-to-read-a-hay-test-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Forage Quality Testing Guide: NDF, ADF, RFV, CP and How to Read a Hay Test Report"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
\n

Reference Guide \u00b7 Forage Quality \u00b7 Updated August 2026<\/p>\n

Forage Quality Testing Guide: NDF, ADF, RFV and CP Explained<\/h1>\n

A forage quality test report contains 10\u201320 numbers \u2014 but four drive virtually every commercial hay pricing and livestock nutrition decision: CP (crude protein)<\/strong>, NDF (neutral detergent fiber)<\/strong>, ADF (acid detergent fiber)<\/strong> \u0648 RFV (relative feed value)<\/strong>. This guide explains each parameter in plain terms, shows how they interact, and demonstrates how to convert a lab report into a market value and livestock feeding decision.<\/p>\n

Covers: the 4 key forage parameters explained \u00b7 USDA hay grading standards \u00b7 how to collect a representative sample \u00b7 how to read a lab report \u00b7 market value implications \u00b7 how baling decisions affect test results<\/p>\n

\n 9YF Square Balers for Premium Hay Production<\/a>
\n Ask About Equipment for Your Target Hay Grade<\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
Four Numbers That Drive Every Hay Market Transaction<\/div>\n
\n
CP (Crude Protein):<\/strong> nitrogen content \u00d7 6.25. Key for livestock protein requirements. Target: above 16% for lactating dairy cows.<\/div>\n
NDF (Neutral Detergent Fiber):<\/strong> total structural fiber. Lower = higher intake capacity. Target: below 40% for dairy, below 55% for horses.<\/div>\n
ADF (Acid Detergent Fiber):<\/strong> lignin and cellulose. Lower = more digestible energy. Target: below 32% for dairy.<\/div>\n
RFV (Relative Feed Value):<\/strong> composite digestibility index. 100 = baseline. Above 150 = premium dairy hay. Above 185 = Supreme grade.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The Four Key Forage Quality Parameters Explained<\/h2>\n

\"9YF<\/p>\n

\n
\n
Crude Protein (CP)<\/span>Nitrogen \u00d7 6.25<\/span><\/div>\n
CP measures the total nitrogen content of the hay multiplied by 6.25 (the theoretical conversion factor from nitrogen to protein). It is the most widely understood hay quality metric and the primary parameter for matching hay to livestock protein requirements. Boot-stage alfalfa reaches 20\u201324% CP; boot-stage grass hay 12\u201318%; post-bloom hay falls to 8\u201312%. Key limitation: CP as measured by the laboratory includes both digestible (available) protein and heat-damaged protein (ADICP \u2014 see the note on heat-damaged protein below). A high CP figure in hay that was baled too wet may overstate the nutritionally useful protein.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF)<\/span>Total structural fiber<\/span><\/div>\n
NDF represents total cell wall fiber \u2014 cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin combined. This is the fiber fraction that physically fills the rumen and limits how much an animal can eat per day. Lower NDF means less physical fill per unit of hay, which means the animal can consume more dry matter before reaching the rumen capacity limit. This is why dairy nutritionists focus intensely on NDF: a cow on 35% NDF hay can eat significantly more dry matter per day than the same cow on 50% NDF hay, translating directly to higher milk production potential. NDF above 60\u201365% means the hay is physically limiting intake below the animal nutritional requirement.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF)<\/span>Cellulose + lignin<\/span><\/div>\n
ADF is the portion of NDF remaining after treating with an acid detergent solution \u2014 it represents cellulose and lignin, the least digestible components of plant cell walls. ADF is the primary predictor of digestible energy in hay: lower ADF means more of the hay is digestibly available as energy. The laboratory calculates TDN (total digestible nutrients) and NEL (net energy for lactation) directly from ADF using standard equations. ADF is also the basis for USDA hay grading \u2014 the lower the ADF, the higher the market grade.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
Relative Feed Value (RFV)<\/span>Composite index<\/span><\/div>\n
RFV is a single composite index calculated from both ADF (which predicts digestibility) and NDF (which predicts intake capacity). The formula: RFV = (88.9 \u2212 0.779 \u00d7 ADF%) \u00d7 (120 \/ NDF%) \/ 1.29. The baseline of 100 was set for full-bloom orchardgrass \u2014 a widely grown perennial grass at the stage where hay production and feed value are roughly in equilibrium. RFV above 100 means the hay delivers more value than that baseline; RFV 185 means the hay delivers 85% more digestible intake capacity than the baseline. RFV is the single most useful number for quickly comparing hays of different quality in commercial markets.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

USDA and Industry Hay Grading Standards<\/h2>\n

The industry hay grading system used on forage test reports and in commercial transactions is based on the parameters above, with RFV as the summary index. The following table reflects the grading standards widely used by forage labs, dairy nutritionists and commercial hay buyers across the US:<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u062f\u0631\u062c\u0629<\/th>\nRFV<\/th>\nADF (%)<\/th>\nNDF (%)<\/th>\nCP (%)<\/th>\nPrimary Market<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\u0633\u0648\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645<\/td>\nAbove 185<\/td>\nBelow 27%<\/td>\nBelow 34%<\/td>\nAbove 19%<\/td>\nHigh-production dairy, performance horses, rabbits<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u063a\u0627\u0644\u064a<\/td>\n170\u2013185<\/td>\n27\u201329%<\/td>\n34\u201339%<\/td>\n17\u201319%<\/td>\nLactating dairy cows, premium horse hay, Japan\/Korea export<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0648\u0644<\/td>\n150\u2013170<\/td>\n29\u201332%<\/td>\n39\u201343%<\/td>\n14\u201316%<\/td>\nDairy (with supplementation), horses in moderate work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062b\u0627\u0646\u064a<\/td>\n130\u2013150<\/td>\n32\u201335%<\/td>\n43\u201347%<\/td>\n11\u201314%<\/td>\nBeef cattle, growing stockers, dry mares<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062b\u0627\u0644\u062b<\/td>\n110\u2013130<\/td>\n35\u201338%<\/td>\n47\u201351%<\/td>\n8\u201311%<\/td>\nDry beef cows, bedding supplement, mature ruminants<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Grade 4\u20135<\/td>\nBelow 110<\/td>\nAbove 38%<\/td>\nAbove 51%<\/td>\nBelow 8%<\/td>\nBedding, very low-quality roughage only. Minimal market value.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

How to Collect a Representative Hay Sample<\/h2>\n

\"9YF-2200<\/p>\n

The quality of a forage test result is only as good as the sample. A single core from one bale is not a representative sample \u2014 forage quality varies between bales, between positions within a bale, and between fields and cuttings. The standard protocol for commercial hay sampling:<\/p>\n

\n
\n 1<\/span><\/p>\n
Define the lot.<\/strong> A lot is all hay from the same field, same cutting, and same baling session. Sample each lot separately \u2014 mixing samples from different fields or cuttings produces a result that represents neither accurately.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n 2<\/span><\/p>\n
Core 20+ bales per lot.<\/strong> Use a Penn State forage sampler \u2014 a hollow coring tube with a sharp tip that is pushed to full depth at the end face of each bale. Push the sampler to full depth (approximately 40\u201345cm into the bale end) to capture core material, not just the outer layer. For round bales: core from the flat end face.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n 3<\/span><\/p>\n
Combine all cores into one bag.<\/strong> Collect all cores from the 20+ bales into a single sealed plastic bag or forage sample bag. Shake or mix the combined sample before transferring to the submission bag. This composite approach averages the natural variation within the lot.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n 4<\/span><\/p>\n
Submit promptly.<\/strong> Send the sample to a certified forage analysis laboratory within 24\u201348 hours of collection. Hay samples in sealed bags continue to respire and can shift in moisture and biochemistry over time. Use a courier or overnight mail for the fastest turnaround. Refrigerate the sample (do not freeze) if shipping is delayed.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n 5<\/span><\/p>\n
Request the right panel.<\/strong> For commercial hay sales: request CP, NDF, ADF, moisture, ash and RFV \u2014 the standard dairy\/equine hay panel. For horse hay targeting laminitis-sensitive markets: add NSC (non-structural carbohydrates). For export: add ash if Japan\/Korea specifications require it.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

How to Read a Forage Test Report<\/h2>\n
\n
The As-Fed vs Dry Matter Basis Distinction<\/div>\n
\n
As-Fed Basis (AF):<\/strong> All values expressed as a percentage of the hay as it is fed \u2014 including the moisture content. A hay with 85% dry matter and 14% CP on a dry matter basis shows 11.9% CP on an as-fed basis. As-fed figures are lower than dry matter figures for all parameters.<\/div>\n
Dry Matter Basis (DM):<\/strong> All values expressed as a percentage of the dry matter content only \u2014 moisture is removed from the calculation. Most forage quality comparisons and grading standards are based on dry matter figures. When comparing hay from different sources, always compare on a dry matter basis.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

Practical rule: compare DM basis figures between different hay samples. Use as-fed basis figures when calculating rations for livestock that receive a known weight of hay per day.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n Heat-damaged protein (ADICP):<\/strong> If the lab reports ADICP (acid detergent insoluble crude protein) above 7\u20138% of total CP, the hay underwent significant heating after baling. This fraction of CP is bound to cell wall fiber and is not digestible \u2014 the effective protein available to the animal is lower than the total CP figure suggests. High ADICP is caused by baling above 20% moisture and is a marker of hay quality that buyers increasingly request on premium dairy and export markets.\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

How Forage Test Results Translate to Market Value<\/h2>\n

\"small<\/p>\n

Forage test results generate measurable price premiums and penalties in the commercial hay market. Dairy buyers pay by the forage test \u2014 a nutritionist adjusts the ration and the farm pays the price that reflects the nutritional value delivered. Horse hay buyers increasingly request test certificates. Export buyers to Japan and Korea specify minimum test parameters as contract conditions.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Buyer Type<\/th>\nKey Parameters Specified<\/th>\nPrice Premium Mechanism<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Dairy farm (lactating cows)<\/td>\nCP above 16%, NDF below 40%, RFV above 150<\/td>\nPrice per tonne negotiated from test \u2014 $15\u2013$30\/tonne premium for Supreme vs Grade 1 in competitive markets<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Horse hay retail \/ feed store<\/td>\nCP, NSC (for metabolic horses), visual quality, moisture<\/td>\nTest certificate included in premium bale pricing; buyers accept premium price when test backs the visual quality claim<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Japan\/Korea export buyer<\/td>\nMoisture below 17%, Ash below 2%, CP by variety, visual grade<\/td>\nContract price set against specifications \u2014 failure to meet specifications triggers price penalty or rejection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Beef cattle buyer<\/td>\nCP above 8\u201310% for maintenance; no mold<\/td>\nTypically buys by visual inspection; test used when receiving poor cow performance that prompts quality investigation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

How Baling Decisions Directly Affect Your Forage Test Result<\/h2>\n

\"9YQ-1950<\/p>\n

\n
Cutting Stage<\/strong>The largest single factor in forage quality outcome. Cutting at boot stage versus 2 weeks post-bloom changes CP by 4\u20138% and RFV by 30\u201360 points \u2014 the difference between Grade 1 and Supreme on the same stand. Owning your own baler provides schedule independence to cut at the correct stage regardless of custom operator availability.<\/div>\n
\u0631\u0637\u0648\u0628\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0644\u0629<\/strong>Baling above 20% causes heating that produces ADICP \u2014 heat-damaged protein that reduces digestible CP below the measured total CP. Baling below 12% causes leaf shatter that reduces leaf content (where CP is concentrated in grass hay) and increases stem content (where NDF and ADF are concentrated). Target 14\u201317%.<\/div>\n
Ash Content<\/strong>Soil pickup from tines running too low increases the ash percentage measured on the forage test. High ash dilutes the nutritive value per unit of hay as weighed. Correct pickup height and spring-tooth (rather than hammer-claw) pickup reduces soil contact and produces lower ash results \u2014 critical for the Japan\/Korea export market (ash below 2% specification).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Equipment That Preserves Forage Quality at Baling<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n \"agricultural
\n <\/a><\/p>\n

Agricultural gearbox and PTO shaft guide for consistent forage quality baling<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Consistent PTO speed at 540rpm through the baling session ensures uniform plunger compression force per bale \u2014 producing consistent bale density that in turn delivers uniform moisture distribution throughout each bale. A bale with uneven density (from PTO speed fluctuation) has variable moisture pockets that produce inconsistent forage test results across the lot and increase the risk of localized heating in the denser, higher-moisture sections. Full PTO speed guide: PTO driveshaft maintenance for consistent forage quality baling<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Frequently Asked Questions \u2014 Forage Quality Testing<\/h2>\n
\n
\nHow much does a forage quality test cost?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
A standard forage quality test panel (CP, NDF, ADF, moisture, ash, RFV) costs $18\u2013$35 per sample at most certified US forage testing laboratories, with results typically available in 2\u20135 business days. A comprehensive panel adding NSC, ADICP, minerals and specific amino acids costs $45\u2013$75. Expedited 24-hour turnaround is available from most labs at a premium of $10\u2013$20. For commercial hay producers testing each cutting of each field: the annual testing cost is $50\u2013$200 per year for a typical small-to-medium operation \u2014 a minor cost relative to the pricing premium a confirmed Supreme-grade result can generate. The Penn State forage sampler (coring tool) is a one-time purchase at $30\u2013$80 from farm supply stores or university extension offices.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
\nIs RFV or RFQ a better indicator of hay quality?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
RFQ (Relative Forage Quality) is a more recent index that accounts for the different digestibility characteristics of different forage types \u2014 particularly the fact that legume fiber (alfalfa, clover) is more digestible than grass fiber at the same NDF level. RFV uses a single NDF-to-intake equation for all forages; RFQ adjusts the digestibility estimate for the specific forage type. For alfalfa hay: RFQ is generally considered the more accurate predictor of dairy cow milk production response because it accounts for the high digestibility of alfalfa cell wall fiber. For grass hay: the difference between RFV and RFQ is smaller, and RFV remains widely used and understood in commercial grass hay markets. Many forage labs now report both indexes. When selling to dairy buyers: confirm which index they use in their purchasing specifications \u2014 some dairy nutritionists have shifted to RFQ for alfalfa evaluation but retain RFV for grass hay evaluation.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
\nCan I test hay after it has been in storage for 6 months?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
Yes \u2014 hay can be tested at any point in its storage life and the result is valid for that hay at that time. The test result reflects the current nutritional status of the hay, which may differ from what it would have shown at baling if any deterioration has occurred during storage. Key changes that occur during storage: moisture loss in outdoor-stored bales (changes the as-fed vs dry matter relationship); weathering of the outer bale layer reduces CP and increases ADF and NDF in the affected zone; and any heating that occurred in the weeks after baling will show elevated ADICP in the test. For hay that was stored correctly and shows no visible deterioration: the test result at 6 months will be close to the result at baling. For hay that weathered outdoors without net wrap: core from the interior of bales (avoiding the outer 10\u201315cm) for a sample that represents the unconsumed hay quality \u2014 the outer layer is often significantly lower quality and will depress the composite result.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
\nWhy is my hay testing lower quality than expected for the cutting stage?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
Several factors can produce a lower test result than the cutting stage would predict. Sampling bias: cores taken primarily from the outer bale surface rather than to full depth will over-represent the weathered outer layer and under-represent the higher-quality interior. Uneven cut stage across the field: grass stands that are uneven in maturity produce bales where some material was boot stage and some was already in bloom \u2014 the composite result reflects the average, which is lower than the purest boot-stage material. Nitrogen deficiency: a stand with inadequate nitrogen will test lower in CP at the same growth stage as a well-fertilized stand \u2014 the plant cannot synthesize protein from nitrogen that is not available. Dilution by low-quality material: weeds in the windrow, particularly broadleaf species at advanced maturity, significantly reduce the composite quality of the lot. And heat damage: if the hay was baled at 19\u201322% moisture and experienced a heat cycle, ADICP may be elevated and effective CP is lower than the total CP figure suggests.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
\nWhich certified forage testing laboratories should I use in the US?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
The National Forage Testing Association (NFTA) maintains a list of certified forage testing laboratories that meet standardized proficiency requirements. Widely used certified laboratories include Dairy One (Ithaca, NY \u2014 extensive dairy forage panel), Ward Laboratories (Kearney, NE \u2014 strong Great Plains presence), Rock River Laboratory (Watertown, WI), Midwest Laboratories (Omaha, NE) and multiple university extension forage labs (University of Kentucky, Virginia Tech, University of Wisconsin). For export testing (ash, pesticide residue, phytosanitary compliance): confirm the laboratory is accredited for the specific test required by the import country \u2014 Japan and Korea have specific approved laboratory lists for import certification purposes.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
\nWhat is NSC and why does it matter for horse hay?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
NSC (non-structural carbohydrates) is the fraction of the hay that consists of sugars and starches \u2014 the rapidly fermentable carbohydrate fraction that converts to lactic acid in the horse hindgut when consumed in excess. High NSC intake in metabolically sensitive horses (those with insulin dysregulation, EMS \u2014 equine metabolic syndrome, or prior laminitis) triggers insulin spikes that can precipitate a laminitis episode. Veterinarians managing these horses typically specify hay with NSC below 10\u201312% on a dry matter basis. NSC is not calculated from the standard NDF\/ADF equations \u2014 it must be specifically requested and measured by the laboratory. Grass hays cut at early boot stage in cool, sunny conditions can have NSC above 15%; the same hay cut later in warmer conditions or after a stress period may be significantly lower. For producers marketing hay to the metabolic horse market: NSC testing adds $8\u2013$15 to the test cost and is a significant differentiator that justifies a premium price in this niche.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
\nDo I need to test every cutting from the same field?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
For commercial hay sales: test every cutting. The quality profile of alfalfa first cut (high yield, often lower CP at early bloom vs late boot cutting), second cut (peak quality in many management systems) and third cut (variable quality depending on summer conditions) can vary enough to place them in different market grades. Selling all cuttings from a field under a single first-cut test result risks misrepresenting the quality of subsequent cuttings in either direction. For own-use beef cattle hay: testing once per year per field is generally sufficient \u2014 beef cattle quality requirements are less sensitive to within-year quality variation. For export and premium dairy markets: some buyers require testing every cutting and every lot with a test certificate attached to the shipment. Establish the testing frequency requirement from your buyer before production and design the testing program to meet their documentation needs.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
\nHow does ash content affect the forage test result and the price?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
Ash is the mineral residue remaining after all organic matter is burned \u2014 in clean hay it represents plant minerals (calcium, phosphorus, potassium, etc.) at typically 6\u201310% DM for legumes and 5\u20138% DM for grasses. When soil is picked up during raking or baling, the soil mineral content significantly increases the ash figure \u2014 soil ash at 5% inclusion in the bale adds approximately 2\u20133 percentage points to the measured ash value. High ash from soil contamination reduces the effective nutritional value per unit of hay because the soil minerals dilute the plant nutrients without providing equivalent livestock nutrition. For the Japan and Korea export market: ash above 2% typically triggers price penalties or rejection \u2014 this is why the 9YFS-2.2 fan system (which actively removes fine soil particles during baling) is specifically valued for these markets. For domestic hay: ash above 12% in alfalfa or 10% in grass hay is an indicator of significant soil contamination that most buyers will discount or reject.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Ready to Produce Hay That Tests at the Grade Your Market Pays For?<\/p>\n

Tell us your target market and forage grade and we will confirm which 9YF square baler<\/a> \u0623\u0648 9YQ round baler<\/a> and management approach is the right fit for your operation.<\/p>\n

\n Discuss Your Target Forage Grade with Our Team<\/a>
\n View 9YF Square Balers for Premium Hay Markets<\/a>\n <\/div>\n

\u0634\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0623\u0645\u0631\u064a\u0643\u0627 \u0625\u064a\u0641\u0631-\u0628\u0627\u0648\u0631 \u0644\u0645\u0639\u062f\u0627\u062a \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u062f\u0648\u062f\u0629 \u00b7 1401 \u0634\u0627\u0631\u0639 21\u060c \u062c\u0646\u0627\u062d R\u060c \u0633\u0643\u0631\u0627\u0645\u0646\u062a\u0648\u060c \u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0648\u0631\u0646\u064a\u0627 95811<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0631\u0631: Cxm<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reference Guide \u00b7 Forage Quality \u00b7 Updated August 2026 Forage Quality Testing Guide: NDF, ADF, RFV and CP Explained A forage quality test report contains 10\u201320 numbers \u2014 but four drive virtually every commercial hay pricing and livestock nutrition decision: CP (crude protein), NDF (neutral detergent fiber), ADF (acid detergent fiber) and RFV (relative feed […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-forage-baler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1295"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1295\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foragebaler.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}