\n| Cover crops (cereal rye, oats)<\/td>\n | Bar Rake<\/td>\n | Cover crop material is bulky and tangled; bar rake’s lifting action handles it better than the lateral sweep of a V-rake<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n Operating Cost Comparison and Long-Term ROI by Rake Type<\/h2>\nBeyond the purchase price comparison, the three rake types differ in their annual operating cost structure. Understanding the total cost of ownership \u2014 initial investment, annual maintenance, replacement parts, and labor \u2014 helps complete the selection decision for operations where multiple types could work agronomically.<\/p>\n \n \n V-Rake annual costs<\/div>\n \n- Tine replacement:<\/strong> $150\u2013$400 every 2\u20133 seasons for a full set per wheel; replace all wheels in the same season<\/li>\n
- Hub bearing service:<\/strong> Low \u2014 wheel hubs have sealed bearings requiring inspection every 2 seasons<\/li>\n
- Frame inspection:<\/strong> Annual check of transport\/working linkage points for fatigue cracks<\/li>\n
- No fuel cost for rake function<\/strong> \u2014 ground-driven design uses zero tractor PTO HP during operation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n Bar Rake annual costs<\/div>\n \n- Tine replacement:<\/strong> Individual spring tines replaced as bent or broken; full set $200\u2013$500 every 3\u20135 seasons<\/li>\n
- Wheel bearing service:<\/strong> More frequent than V-rake \u2014 tines contact ground more forcefully on bar-rake designs<\/li>\n
- Transport linkage wear:<\/strong> Hitch and transport pivot points wear faster under the lateral forces of the raking action<\/li>\n
- Fuel cost:<\/strong> Minimal if ground-driven; moderate if PTO-powered variant<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n Horizontal Rake annual costs<\/div>\n \n- Gearbox service:<\/strong> Annual oil change in PTO-driven gearbox; inspect gear wear every 2 seasons<\/li>\n
- Tine replacement:<\/strong> Impact-loading from heavy crops causes tine fatigue fractures; budget $300\u2013$600\/season for a heavily used unit<\/li>\n
- Rotor bearing service:<\/strong> The main rotor bearings require annual inspection and periodic replacement<\/li>\n
- Fuel cost:<\/strong> PTO power demand is meaningful \u2014 adds 5\u201310 L\/hr fuel consumption vs. ground-driven alternatives<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Quality value of leaf retention:<\/strong> For operations selling alfalfa to premium dairy or export markets, the quality premium from better leaf retention can justify the V-rake’s higher purchase price even against a cheaper bar rake alternative. A 3% difference in dry matter leaf loss at $160\/ton premium alfalfa on 300 tons\/year = $1,440\/year in quality value retained. Over a 10-year rake life, that is $14,400 in additional captured quality value \u2014 which comfortably exceeds the typical price premium of a V-rake over a comparable bar rake.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n Hay Rake Type FAQs<\/h2>\n\n \nCan a V-rake be used for tedding as well as raking?+<\/span><\/summary>\nStandard V-rakes are not designed for tedding \u2014 they are designed to merge and windrow, not to spread. The V configuration inherently gathers crop toward the center rather than distributing it across a wide area. Some V-rake manufacturers offer a “spread” mode where the wheel angles are reversed to push hay outward rather than inward, but this is a compromise function and not as effective as a dedicated tedder or a bar rake in spread mode. For operations that need both tedding and windrowing from a single machine, a bar rake with reversible wheel rotation (available on many modern designs) is the more versatile choice. If maximum leaf retention in alfalfa is the priority, the V-rake is the better choice and a separate tedder handles the spreading function. Combining functions into one machine involves compromises \u2014 know which function is your priority.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nHow many finger wheels does a V-rake need for my field width?+<\/span><\/summary>\nThe number of wheels determines the total working width of the V-rake. Each finger wheel typically covers a 1.2\u20131.5 meter swath width depending on wheel diameter and tine length. A 9-wheel V-rake covers approximately 9\u201311 meters of working width; a 12-wheel model covers 12\u201315 meters. The correct working width depends on your mowing width: the rake’s working width should match or slightly exceed the total mowing width per pass so that a single rake pass collects all of the mowed crop without leaving strips unraked. For a 9-meter mower combination, a 9-wheel V-rake is typically the minimum; a 12-wheel model provides additional margin for the occasional pass overlap or windrow displacement from wind. Match the rake width to your mowing system width to minimize the number of rake passes required per unit area.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nAt what ground speed should I rake, and does speed affect leaf loss?+<\/span><\/summary>\nYes \u2014 ground speed directly affects leaf loss, particularly in V-rake operation. Higher speed increases the angular velocity of the finger wheels (which are ground-driven), which increases the tine tip speed and the force with which the tines contact dry leaves. Research on V-rake speed effects consistently shows increasing leaf loss with speed above the optimal range. For alfalfa, the optimal speed range is 6\u201310 km\/h (4\u20136 mph) depending on crop moisture \u2014 drier crop requires slower speed. Above 12 km\/h, leaf loss in dry alfalfa becomes significant regardless of tine height adjustment. For grass hay, the speed sensitivity is lower because grass stems are more flexible and less prone to leaf fracture from tine contact. Use ground speed as a lever: slow down for the last rake pass when the crop is at its driest, and you can tolerate higher speed in the first rake pass when the crop still has higher moisture content.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nShould I rake alfalfa in the morning or afternoon?+<\/span><\/summary>\nTiming is significant for leaf retention. Morning raking \u2014 after the dew has dried from the leaf surface (typically 9\u201311 AM) but before peak afternoon drying \u2014 gives a window when crop moisture is in the 18\u201322% range that minimizes leaf shatter. Afternoon raking on a hot, dry day can push crop moisture below 14% in the windrow, significantly increasing leaf loss. The exception is when you are using raking specifically to accelerate drying \u2014 tedding or raking in the early afternoon on a sunny day maximizes drying rate. The decision depends on whether you need to accelerate drying (afternoon is better) or minimize leaf loss (late morning after dew is better). For premium alfalfa where quality is paramount, always prioritize late-morning raking over afternoon raking when you have scheduling flexibility.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nHow often do V-rake tines need replacement, and what are the signs of worn tines?+<\/span><\/summary>\nV-rake tine life varies by soil abrasiveness, crop volume per season, and ground speed. In typical commercial hay conditions, tines wear 3\u20137mm per season from the tip inward. Replacement is needed when: the effective tine length has shortened to the point where you can no longer achieve correct tip-to-ground clearance without lowering the wheel frame to a position that causes the wheel hub to approach ground level; the tine tips show mushrooming or cracking from fatigue fractures; or you notice increased crop loss (unraked strips) despite correct height adjustment. Most commercial operations replace tines every 2\u20134 seasons on high-use rakes. Always replace tines as complete sets per wheel to maintain balanced sweep \u2014 mixing old and new tines on the same wheel creates uneven sweep height that disrupts windrow consistency.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nIs it better to rake into one wide windrow or two narrower windrows per pass?+<\/span><\/summary>\nThe decision depends on your baler and your drying requirements. A single wide windrow provides more volume per baler pass, improving throughput, but dries more slowly in its core because the pile height insulates the interior from airflow. Two narrower windrows dry faster but require two baler passes. The optimal windrow size is the widest that the baler’s pickup can handle at full baler speed without overflow or slugging \u2014 typically 1.2 to 1.4 times the baler’s rated pickup width. If your windrow regularly exceeds this width and the baler slows or slugs on the windrow center, split to two windrows per pass. If the windrow is well within the baler’s capacity and your drying conditions are not limiting your schedule, a wider single windrow is more efficient.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n |