\n| Grass hay (livestock)<\/td>\n | 3\u20135 T\/acre<\/td>\n | $120\u2013$160\/ton<\/td>\n | $360\u2013$800<\/td>\n | $150\u2013$220<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n Forage Crop Selection FAQs<\/h2>\n\n \nMy soil pH is 6.0 \u2014 can I grow alfalfa if I lime heavily at seeding?+<\/span><\/summary>\nLime at seeding does not create the conditions for successful alfalfa establishment \u2014 lime takes 12\u201318 months to fully react with soil particles and raise pH. At pH 6.0, alfalfa seedlings may emerge but will fail to nodulate effectively, producing nitrogen-deficient plants that appear yellowed and stunted by mid-summer. The practical path: apply lime 12\u201318 months before seeding and grow an annual crop in the interim; test pH from 3\u20136 inches depth in the target field just before seeding; confirm pH above 6.4 before seeding alfalfa. If the site cannot achieve pH 6.4 without prohibitive lime cost (e.g., highly acidic subsoils), consider a mixed alfalfa-grass stand at 30\u201340% alfalfa instead, or plant orchardgrass or tall fescue which tolerate pH down to 5.8\u20136.0.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nIs timothy still worth growing when alfalfa commands such a price premium?+<\/span><\/summary>\nTimothy retains a strong market position in specific applications where its characteristics are preferred over alfalfa. Premium horse markets \u2014 particularly for thoroughbred racehorses, sport horses, and rabbits \u2014 actively prefer high-quality timothy hay because its lower protein (10\u201314% vs alfalfa’s 18\u201326%) reduces the risk of nutritional imbalances in hard-working horses, and its firmer stems provide better digestive function in hindgut fermenters. Japan and Korea are major export markets for premium U.S. timothy hay that can command prices competitive with export alfalfa. In the Pacific Northwest where the climate suits timothy particularly well, many producers achieve economics comparable to alfalfa through premium horse and export pricing. The key is market access \u2014 timothy grown without access to these premium channels is a lower-value commodity than alfalfa for most buyers.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nCan I plant alfalfa on a field that has had alfalfa in the last 3 years?+<\/span><\/summary>\nPlanting alfalfa directly back into a field with existing or recently terminated alfalfa is not recommended due to alfalfa autotoxicity. Established alfalfa roots release allelopathic compounds into the soil that suppress new alfalfa seedling establishment \u2014 the compounds persist for 6\u201318 months depending on temperature, moisture, and soil organic matter. The standard recommendation is to wait 12 months (one full growing season) after alfalfa stand termination before reseeding alfalfa, using that year for a non-autotoxic rotation crop such as corn, small grain, or annual grass. Attempting to reseed directly into terminated alfalfa typically produces uneven stands with 30\u201360% lower plant density than expected, often requiring re-establishment at additional cost within 2\u20133 years when the sparse stand cannot maintain weed competition or adequate yield.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nWhat is the most common mistake in forage crop selection?+<\/span><\/summary>\nPlanting the crop with the best market value without confirming site suitability \u2014 specifically, planting alfalfa on sites with poor drainage or low pH because alfalfa commands the highest price. The result is a stand that fails within 2\u20133 years from Phytophthora root rot (poor drainage), bacterial wilt (low-pH-stressed plants), or winter injury (nitrogen-deficient plants from poor nodulation accumulate insufficient carbohydrate reserves for winter survival). The correct approach is always site first: evaluate drainage, pH, and rooting depth before considering the crop. If the site supports alfalfa, plant alfalfa. If it does not, plant the best-adapted crop for the actual site conditions and manage the marketing accordingly. A healthy, persistent grass hay stand on unsuitable-for-alfalfa ground produces more total revenue over 10 years than an alfalfa stand that fails in year 3 and requires re-establishment.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nHow do I decide between 100% alfalfa and a mixed stand on a marginal site?+<\/span><\/summary>\nThe decision criteria: if pH is in the range 6.2\u20136.5 (marginal but not disqualifying for alfalfa), a mixed stand at 50\u201360% alfalfa seeding rate is a better risk management choice than pure alfalfa. The grass component will fill in as alfalfa thins from pH stress, maintaining a productive stand that a pure alfalfa stand would not sustain. If pH is above 6.5 and drainage is adequate but the site has a history of winterkill or disease pressure, selecting a higher winter hardiness variety (WH 4 or 5) in a pure stand is appropriate. If pH is below 6.2 and cannot be economically raised, grass hay is the correct answer regardless of the alfalfa price premium. The mixed stand approach works well on borderline sites (pH 6.2\u20136.4) with known winter stress, where the investment in pH correction to reach 6.5+ would require 2\u20133 years of lime applications before seeding \u2014 during which time a mixed stand at the current pH can produce cash flow while the lime gradually improves conditions for subsequent alfalfa overseeding or renovation.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n \nWhat is the most undervalued forage crop in the current U.S. market?+<\/span><\/summary>\nHigh-quality orchardgrass and orchardgrass-alfalfa mixtures for horse markets in many regions are consistently undervalued relative to the premium available if marketed directly. Many orchardgrass producers sell into the commodity livestock market at grass hay prices when the same hay \u2014 tested, packaged attractively, and marketed directly to horse owners or equine facilities \u2014 commands $30\u2013$60\/ton above commodity pricing. The orchardgrass crop’s quality ceiling at boot stage (RFV 160\u2013185) is comparable to mid-quality alfalfa, and horse owners who have had digestive issues with high-protein alfalfa often actively prefer premium orchardgrass. The undervaluation persists because most producers don’t invest in the direct marketing relationship \u2014 they sell through an elevator that aggregates and blends without capturing the premium. If you are growing orchardgrass and selling it at generic grass hay prices, testing your hay, identifying its quality, and developing direct horse-owner accounts in your region is likely the highest-ROI marketing change available to your operation.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n |